Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Astrology as a Psychological Research Area

Astrology offers a special tool in psychological assistance. Inspired by the principle “as above, so below,” the position of the planets informs us through synchronicity about what happens on Earth, both on an individual and collective level. This is hard to believe for a rational mind, yet the latest advances in psychology, especially in transpersonal psychology, confirm this hypothesis. Both fields, whether it’s transpersonal psychology or astrology, approach the human psyche from different angles but intersect.

Convergence on the archetypes

The work of Carl Jung, a pioneer of analytical psychology and influential in the development of transpersonal psychology, introduces the concept of archetypes, innate structures of the collective unconscious shared across humanity. Astropsychology, based on the positions and movements of celestial bodies, also assigns archetypal qualities to each planet and zodiac sign. Research in transpersonal psychology exploring the manifestations of archetypes in dreams, visions, and altered states of consciousness supports the idea that these universal patterns can be reflected in astrological configurations, validating the archetypal approach of astropsychology.

Studies on Synchronicity

Synchronicity, a key concept in both transpersonal psychology and astropsychology, describes meaningful coincidences between internal and external events that are not related by causality. Research on synchronicity, especially in the context of coincidences between psychic states and astrological events, strengthens the idea that the universe is an interconnected whole where psyche and cosmos resonate, a fundamental principle of astropsychology.

Validation of Transpersonal Experiences

Transpersonal psychology validates the importance of experiences that transcend the ego and the limits of personal identity, such as peak experiences, spiritual epiphanies, or deep encounters with the numinous. These experiences are often described by individuals as being influenced or preceded by significant astrological transits, suggesting that astropsychology can offer a framework for understanding how and why these experiences occur in the context of a person’s life.

Research on Life Cycles and Planetary Transits

Some works in transpersonal psychology examine life cycles and their correspondence with significant psychological and spiritual transitions. Astropsychology, focusing on planetary transits and return cycles (like Saturn’s return), proposes temporal frameworks that may coincide with these periods of transformation. Studies linking personal development phases to specific astrological cycles provide empirical validation for the idea that planetary transits can mark significant thresholds in psychological and spiritual growth.

Going further, let’s consider works on consciousness. I’m thinking specifically of the work of David Bohm, Bernardo Kastrup, Ervin Laszlo, and Rupert Sheldrake, which offer fascinating perspectives that, while not directly related to astrology, can nevertheless provide a theoretical framework supporting some of its fundamental hypotheses. These scientists and philosophers explore concepts such as non-locality, unified consciousness, morphic fields, and the theory of implicate order, all of which can be interpreted as providing indirect validation for the way astrology operates on a cosmic and psychological level.

David Böhm and the Implicate Order

David Böhm, , a theoretical physicist, proposed the concept of the implicate order, an underlying reality to our experienced universe. According to Bohm, this order is not directly visible but serves as a kind of backdrop from which our explicit reality (the explicate order) emerges. Astrology, in this context, could be seen as an attempt to decode the patterns and influences of this implicate order on individuals and terrestrial events, using the position of celestial bodies as indicators or symbols reflecting the deep dynamics of the implicate order.

Bernardo Kastrup and Unified Consciousness

Bernardo Kastrup, a philosopher and scientist, argues that reality is fundamentally conscious, a central idea in his argument for metaphysical idealism. This view aligns with astrology in suggesting that everything in the universe is interconnected through a universal consciousness or mind. Astrological configurations, from this perspective, reflect modulations of this unified consciousness, influencing individuals and collectives according to conscious patterns.

Ervin Laszlo and the Akashic Field

Ervin Laszlo proposes the concept of the Akashic field, an information field that records and transmits the experiences of the entire universe, relying on quantum field theory. Astrology could be interpreted through this lens as a means of interacting with this information field, where the positions and movements of planets at the time of birth or other key moments serve as keys to accessing specific information stored in the Akashic field.

Rupert Sheldrake and Morphic Fields

Rupert Sheldrake, a biologist, introduced the idea of morphic fields, fields that influence the formation of structures in nature and the behavior of living beings through kinds of “cosmic habits.” Astrology can be seen as aligned with this theory, in that it suggests that astral configurations act like morphic fields influencing patterns of behavior, events, and psychological dispositions of individuals.

Richard Tarnas and Archetypal Astrology

o conclude, I would like to mention the work of Richard Tarnas, an influential author, philosopher, and depth psychologist known for his work in depth psychology, philosophy of history, and archetypal astrology. In his landmark book “Cosmos and Psyche,” Tarnas offers a groundbreaking approach that redefines the field of astrology. Through meticulous analysis of planetary cycles and historical events, Tarnas demonstrates how planetary conjunctions, oppositions, and other aspects correspond to periods of significant transformation, both collectively and individually.

His research highlights the synchronicity between celestial movements and major historical turning points, suggesting the presence of a cosmic intelligence or a “synchronized” order that orchestrates the unfolding of events for the evolution and growth of consciousness.

Tarnas work on archetypal astrology provides insights into the connections between celestial movements and human experience. Combining Jungian psychology with astronomical observation, he offers a vision of the sky not as a mere predictive tool but as a living map of the psychic and cultural forces that shape our world. Archetypal astrology is based on the idea that planetary configurations reflect archetypal patterns, that is, fundamental principles or universal forces that influence the human psyche and earthly events. These timeless and universal motifs structure our experience of the world through recurring themes, such as the hero (Sun), the messenger (Mercury), or the revolutionary (Uranus).

Unlike traditional astrology, which may lean towards prediction, archetypal astrology focuses on a deep understanding of the psychological and spiritual dynamics at play in individuals and the collective. It invites reflection on how cosmic cycles resonate within our inner lives and our sociocultural environment.

Conclusion

While the thinkers mentioned have not specifically designed their theories to validate astrology, their works offer perspectives that support a deeper understanding of astrological principles. By postulating an interconnected universe, governed by fields of information and influence, and a consciousness that pervades everything, they provide a conceptual framework within which astrology might be viewed not as superstition but as an ancient and symbolic way of interacting with the depths of reality. These ideas suggest that astrology, far from being an isolated practice, could be related to fundamental principles of the universe, as these researchers on the frontier of science and philosophy suggest.

Leave a comment